Vikings vs Packers: Counterpoint

Packers are better than Vikings. This is true because they are overall the better team. They have better defensive backs, better wide receivers  better Defensive and offensive tackles, and lets not forget who's the better quarterback. Logically speaking they are a well rounded team and were close to a perfect season last year. Although Minnesota beat them barely with a last minute kick and lost the very next game.

This shows that although Minnesota has the passion but is not ready to play with the big boys. They need more skillful and young players. The team can't rely on Peterson alone. He needs more people to help him like the offensive line. They need to get better players. Occasionally there is a hole made but it is small and Peterson has to run faster than normal to go through it. Constant disappointment from players aggravates everyone, they need help, and fast!

Vikings are better than the Packers in many ways. The draft is a great example, the Vikings got Cordarrelle Patterson, a wide receiver from Tennessee. He was amazing in high school, so colleges wanted him, and he chose Tennessee. The Vikings saw a great player and choose him to play for them. The second player that the Vikings chose was Xavier Rhodes, he is a cornerback. This guy is so good they took him while he was a junior. All three years of college he was a starter.

The Vikings are better than the Packers not only because of offensive, but they also drafted some defensive players like Sharrif Floyd, Jeff Baca and Everett Dawkins. They were all drafted by the Vikings. The Vikings have a great chance of beating the Packers, and also going to the playoffs, and might even winning a Super Bowl. With their wide receiver and great defenders the Vikings are going to win.

Reply

Forward